12/29/2023 0 Comments Hpw to run cylance antivirus search![]() The difference can be mainly attributed to the fact that traditional AV immediately launched a preemptive scan of the filesystem. That is a big difference compared to the 19% of the other traditional AV. The results differ only by 6% from the baseline. This was the average score:īased on this research, we expect a positive future for Cylance. The baseline we achieved without any Anti-virus installed on the VMs was a VSIbaseline average response time score of 714.Īfterwards we installed CylancePROTECT, and we did more than 10 tests. This index simplifies comparisons and makes it possible to understand the true impact of configuration changes on hypervisor host or guest level. With Virtual Desktop Infrastructure (VDI) and Terminal Services (RDS) workloads, this is valid and useful information. VSImax is the ‘ Virtual Session Index (VSI)’. Cylance was run in the most restrictive setting, with all features enabledĪll results were given a VSIbaseline average response time (ms) score, that is based on the VSImax.We used the following setup on our 4-node Nutanix environment (total of 223.9 Ghz, 1TB DDR3).Īll tests where done using Login VSI 4.1.7.13 on a pool of 20 machines with a direct desktop connection: ![]() ![]() The difference between Cylance and traditional Anti-Virus is that Cylance uses artificial intelligence and machine learning to stop malware and other treats instead of the traditional pattern-based scanning, which is more CPU intensive. Therefore, we created a LoginVSI test environment on our Nutanix-based development lab in order to compare CylancePROTECT with traditional anti-virus. In the beginning, we had no available test environment in our lab.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |